HID: wacom: Tie cached HID_DG_CONTACTCOUNT indices to report ID
authorJason Gerecke <killertofu@gmail.com>
Wed, 7 Oct 2015 23:54:21 +0000 (16:54 -0700)
committerJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:13:11 +0000 (13:13 +0200)
The cached indicies 'cc_index' and 'cc_value_index' introduced in 1b5d514
are only valid for a single report ID. If a touchscreen has multiple
reports with a HID_DG_CONTACTCOUNT usage, its possible that the values
will not be correct for the report we're handling, resulting in an
incorrect value for 'num_expected'. This has been observed with the Cintiq
Companion 2.

To address this, we store the ID of the report those indicies are valid
for in a new  'cc_report' variable. Before using them to get the expected
contact count, we first check if the ID of the report we're processing
matches 'cc_report'. If it doesn't, we update the indicies to point to
the HID_DG_CONTACTCOUNT usage of the current report (if it has one).

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jason Gerecke <jason.gerecke@wacom.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
drivers/hid/wacom_wac.c
drivers/hid/wacom_wac.h

index 0215ab6..9c3b144 100644 (file)
@@ -1628,6 +1628,7 @@ static void wacom_wac_finger_usage_mapping(struct hid_device *hdev,
                wacom_map_usage(input, usage, field, EV_KEY, BTN_TOUCH, 0);
                break;
        case HID_DG_CONTACTCOUNT:
+               wacom_wac->hid_data.cc_report = field->report->id;
                wacom_wac->hid_data.cc_index = field->index;
                wacom_wac->hid_data.cc_value_index = usage->usage_index;
                break;
@@ -1715,6 +1716,31 @@ static void wacom_wac_finger_pre_report(struct hid_device *hdev,
        struct wacom_wac *wacom_wac = &wacom->wacom_wac;
        struct hid_data* hid_data = &wacom_wac->hid_data;
 
+       if (hid_data->cc_report != 0 &&
+           hid_data->cc_report != report->id) {
+               int i;
+
+               hid_data->cc_report = report->id;
+               hid_data->cc_index = -1;
+               hid_data->cc_value_index = -1;
+
+               for (i = 0; i < report->maxfield; i++) {
+                       struct hid_field *field = report->field[i];
+                       int j;
+
+                       for (j = 0; j < field->maxusage; j++) {
+                               if (field->usage[j].hid == HID_DG_CONTACTCOUNT) {
+                                       hid_data->cc_index = i;
+                                       hid_data->cc_value_index = j;
+
+                                       /* break */
+                                       i = report->maxfield;
+                                       j = field->maxusage;
+                               }
+                       }
+               }
+       }
+
        if (hid_data->cc_index >= 0) {
                struct hid_field *field = report->field[hid_data->cc_index];
                int value = field->value[hid_data->cc_value_index];
index 1e270d4..809c03e 100644 (file)
@@ -198,6 +198,7 @@ struct hid_data {
        int width;
        int height;
        int id;
+       int cc_report;
        int cc_index;
        int cc_value_index;
        int num_expected;