perf/x86/intel: Print LBR support statement after validation
authorDavid Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@google.com>
Tue, 21 Jun 2016 18:31:10 +0000 (11:31 -0700)
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Mon, 27 Jun 2016 09:34:18 +0000 (11:34 +0200)
The following commit:

  338b522ca43c ("perf/x86/intel: Protect LBR and extra_regs against KVM lying")

added an additional test to LBR support detection that is performed after
printing the LBR support statement to dmesg.

Move the LBR support output after the very last test, to make sure we
print the true status of LBR support.

Signed-off-by: David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1466533874-52003-2-git-send-email-davidcc@google.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c

index 3ed528c..61a027b 100644 (file)
@@ -3958,6 +3958,8 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
                        x86_pmu.lbr_nr = 0;
        }
 
+       if (x86_pmu.lbr_nr)
+               pr_cont("%d-deep LBR, ", x86_pmu.lbr_nr);
        /*
         * Access extra MSR may cause #GP under certain circumstances.
         * E.g. KVM doesn't support offcore event
index 9e2b40c..2dca66c 100644 (file)
@@ -956,7 +956,6 @@ void __init intel_pmu_lbr_init_core(void)
         * SW branch filter usage:
         * - compensate for lack of HW filter
         */
-       pr_cont("4-deep LBR, ");
 }
 
 /* nehalem/westmere */
@@ -977,7 +976,6 @@ void __init intel_pmu_lbr_init_nhm(void)
         *   That requires LBR_FAR but that means far
         *   jmp need to be filtered out
         */
-       pr_cont("16-deep LBR, ");
 }
 
 /* sandy bridge */
@@ -997,7 +995,6 @@ void __init intel_pmu_lbr_init_snb(void)
         *   That requires LBR_FAR but that means far
         *   jmp need to be filtered out
         */
-       pr_cont("16-deep LBR, ");
 }
 
 /* haswell */
@@ -1010,8 +1007,6 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_init_hsw(void)
 
        x86_pmu.lbr_sel_mask = LBR_SEL_MASK;
        x86_pmu.lbr_sel_map  = hsw_lbr_sel_map;
-
-       pr_cont("16-deep LBR, ");
 }
 
 /* skylake */
@@ -1031,7 +1026,6 @@ __init void intel_pmu_lbr_init_skl(void)
         *   That requires LBR_FAR but that means far
         *   jmp need to be filtered out
         */
-       pr_cont("32-deep LBR, ");
 }
 
 /* atom */
@@ -1057,7 +1051,6 @@ void __init intel_pmu_lbr_init_atom(void)
         * SW branch filter usage:
         * - compensate for lack of HW filter
         */
-       pr_cont("8-deep LBR, ");
 }
 
 /* slm */
@@ -1088,6 +1081,4 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_init_knl(void)
 
        x86_pmu.lbr_sel_mask = LBR_SEL_MASK;
        x86_pmu.lbr_sel_map  = snb_lbr_sel_map;
-
-       pr_cont("8-deep LBR, ");
 }