From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 07:04:27 +0000 (+0530)
Subject: cpufreq: No need to check for has_target()
X-Git-Tag: v4.0-rc1~9^2^4~40
X-Git-Url: http://git.cascardo.info/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=2e1cc3a5d7efa42d3aa4aaa77b9b2c3a51bb6073;hp=42f91fa1166f1d6c9fba37f167dd3c3f846be00a;p=cascardo%2Flinux.git

cpufreq: No need to check for has_target()

Either we can be setpolicy or target type, nothing else. And so the
else part of setpolicy will automatically be of has_target() type.
And so we don't need to check it again.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index faffdaaba343..1454ab3f0023 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ static int cpufreq_parse_governor(char *str_governor, unsigned int *policy,
 			*policy = CPUFREQ_POLICY_POWERSAVE;
 			err = 0;
 		}
-	} else if (has_target()) {
+	} else {
 		struct cpufreq_governor *t;
 
 		mutex_lock(&cpufreq_governor_mutex);