From f363938c70a04e6bc99023a5e0c44ef7879b903f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andy Lutomirski Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 15:24:31 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] x86/fpu: Fix 'no387' regression After fixing FPU option parsing, we now parse the 'no387' boot option too early: no387 clears X86_FEATURE_FPU before it's even probed, so the boot CPU promptly re-enables it. I suspect it gets even more confused on SMP. Fix the probing code to leave X86_FEATURE_FPU off if it's been disabled by setup_clear_cpu_cap(). Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: Brian Gerst Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: Denys Vlasenko Cc: Fenghua Yu Cc: H. Peter Anvin Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Quentin Casasnovas Cc: Sai Praneeth Prakhya Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: yu-cheng yu Fixes: 4f81cbafcce2 ("x86/fpu: Fix early FPU command-line parsing") Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/kernel/fpu/init.c | 14 ++++++++------ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/init.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/init.c index 6d9f0a7ef4c8..d53ab3d3b8e8 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/init.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/init.c @@ -78,13 +78,15 @@ static void fpu__init_system_early_generic(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) cr0 &= ~(X86_CR0_TS | X86_CR0_EM); write_cr0(cr0); - asm volatile("fninit ; fnstsw %0 ; fnstcw %1" - : "+m" (fsw), "+m" (fcw)); + if (!test_bit(X86_FEATURE_FPU, (unsigned long *)cpu_caps_cleared)) { + asm volatile("fninit ; fnstsw %0 ; fnstcw %1" + : "+m" (fsw), "+m" (fcw)); - if (fsw == 0 && (fcw & 0x103f) == 0x003f) - set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_FPU); - else - clear_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_FPU); + if (fsw == 0 && (fcw & 0x103f) == 0x003f) + set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_FPU); + else + clear_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_FPU); + } #ifndef CONFIG_MATH_EMULATION if (!cpu_has_fpu) { -- 2.20.1