ath10k: fix spurious tx/rx during boot

ath10k: fix spurious tx/rx during boot

HW Rx filters and masks are not configured
properly by firmware during boot sequences. The
MAC_PCU_ADDR1 is set to 0s instead of 1s which
allows the HW to ACK any frame that passes through
MAC_PCU_RX_FILTER. The MAC_PCU_RX_FILTER itself
is misconfigured on boot as well.

The combination of these bugs ended up with the
following manifestations:
 - "no channel configured; ignoring frame(s)!"
   warnings in the driver
 - spurious ACKs (transmission) on the air during
   firmware bootup sequences

The former was a long standing and known bug
originally though mostly harmless.

However Marek recently discovered that this
problem also involves ACKing *all* frames the HW
receives (including beacons ;). Such frames
are delivered to host and generate the former
warning as well.

This could be a problem with regulatory compliance
in some rare cases (e.g. Taiwan which forbids
transmissions on channel 36 which is the default
bootup channel on 5Ghz band cards). The good news
is that it'd require someone else to violate
regulatory first to coerce our device to generate
and transmit an ACK.

The problem could be reproduced in a rather busy
environment that has a lot of APs. The likelihood
could be increased by injecting an msleep() of
5000 or longer immediately after
ath10k_htt_setup() in ath10k_core_start().

The reason why the former warnings were only
showing up seldom is because the device was either
quickly reset again (i.e. during firmware probing)
or wmi vdev was created (which fixes hw and fw
states).

It is technically possible for host driver to
override adequate hw registers however this can't
work reliably because the bug root cause lies in
incorrect firmware state on boot (internal
structure used to program MAC_PCU_ADDR1 is not
properly initialized) and only vdev create/delete
events can fix it. This is why the patch takes
dummy vdev approach.

This could be fixed in firmware as well but having
this fixed in driver is more robust, most notably
when thinking of users of older firmware such as
999.999.0.636.

Reported-by: Marek Puzyniak <marek.puzyniak@tieto.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>