[IA64] disable irq's and check need_resched before safe_halt
authorDimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
Tue, 7 Aug 2007 13:49:32 +0000 (08:49 -0500)
committerTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:17:23 +0000 (10:17 -0700)
commit71416bea5afa9e5a6c76c1509ab69c46c857a2bb
tree24e411bb388bcc00289aca20d9aa88722f8b5cd2
parent39d3520c92cf7a28c07229ca00cc35a1e8026c77
[IA64] disable irq's and check need_resched before safe_halt

While sending interrupts to a cpu to repeatedly wake a thread, on occasion
that thread will take a full timer tick cycle (4002 usec in my case)
to wakeup.

The problem concerns a race condition in the code around the safe_halt()
call in the default_idle() routine.  Setting 'nohalt' on the kernel
command line causes the long wakeups to disappear.

void
default_idle (void)
{
        local_irq_enable();
        while (!need_resched()) {
-->             if (can_do_pal_halt)
-->                     safe_halt();
                else

A timer tick could arrive between the check for !need_resched and the
actual call to safe_halt() (which does a pal call to PAL_HALT_LIGHT).
By the time the timer tick completes, a thread that might now need to run
could get held up for as long as a timer tick waiting for the halted cpu.

I'm proposing that we disable irq's and check need_resched again before
calling safe_halt().  Does anyone see any problem with this approach?

Signed-off-by: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
arch/ia64/kernel/process.c