x86/mm/pkeys: Add new 'PF_PK' page fault error code bit

Note: "PK" is how the Intel SDM refers to this bit, so we also
use that nomenclature.

This only defines the bit, it does not plumb it anywhere to be
handled.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160212210207.DA7B43E6@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
index eef44d9..9f72f9c 100644 (file)
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
  *   bit 2 ==   0: kernel-mode access  1: user-mode access
  *   bit 3 ==                          1: use of reserved bit detected
  *   bit 4 ==                          1: fault was an instruction fetch
+ *   bit 5 ==                          1: protection keys block access
  */
 enum x86_pf_error_code {
 
@@ -41,6 +42,7 @@ enum x86_pf_error_code {
        PF_USER         =               1 << 2,
        PF_RSVD         =               1 << 3,
        PF_INSTR        =               1 << 4,
+       PF_PK           =               1 << 5,
 };
 
 /*
@@ -916,6 +918,12 @@ static int spurious_fault_check(unsigned long error_code, pte_t *pte)
 
        if ((error_code & PF_INSTR) && !pte_exec(*pte))
                return 0;
+       /*
+        * Note: We do not do lazy flushing on protection key
+        * changes, so no spurious fault will ever set PF_PK.
+        */
+       if ((error_code & PF_PK))
+               return 1;
 
        return 1;
 }