From: Davidlohr Bueso Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 20:03:12 +0000 (-0700) Subject: locking/mutex: Use acquire/release semantics X-Git-Tag: v4.4-rc1~157^2~5 X-Git-Url: http://git.cascardo.info/?p=cascardo%2Flinux.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=81a43adae3b943193fb3afd20a36a7482332f964 locking/mutex: Use acquire/release semantics As of 654672d4ba1 (locking/atomics: Add _{acquire|release|relaxed}() variants of some atomic operations) and 6d79ef2d30e (locking, asm-generic: Add _{relaxed|acquire|release}() variants for 'atomic_long_t'), weakly ordered archs can benefit from more relaxed use of barriers when locking and unlocking, instead of regular full barrier semantics. While currently only arm64 supports such optimizations, updating corresponding locking primitives serves for other archs to immediately benefit as well, once the necessary machinery is implemented of course. Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Paul E. McKenney Cc: Paul E.McKenney Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Will Deacon Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1443643395-17016-3-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- diff --git a/include/asm-generic/mutex-dec.h b/include/asm-generic/mutex-dec.h index d4f9fb4e53df..fd694cfd678a 100644 --- a/include/asm-generic/mutex-dec.h +++ b/include/asm-generic/mutex-dec.h @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ static inline void __mutex_fastpath_lock(atomic_t *count, void (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *)) { - if (unlikely(atomic_dec_return(count) < 0)) + if (unlikely(atomic_dec_return_acquire(count) < 0)) fail_fn(count); } @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ __mutex_fastpath_lock(atomic_t *count, void (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *)) static inline int __mutex_fastpath_lock_retval(atomic_t *count) { - if (unlikely(atomic_dec_return(count) < 0)) + if (unlikely(atomic_dec_return_acquire(count) < 0)) return -1; return 0; } @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ __mutex_fastpath_lock_retval(atomic_t *count) static inline void __mutex_fastpath_unlock(atomic_t *count, void (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *)) { - if (unlikely(atomic_inc_return(count) <= 0)) + if (unlikely(atomic_inc_return_release(count) <= 0)) fail_fn(count); } @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ __mutex_fastpath_unlock(atomic_t *count, void (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *)) static inline int __mutex_fastpath_trylock(atomic_t *count, int (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *)) { - if (likely(atomic_cmpxchg(count, 1, 0) == 1)) + if (likely(atomic_cmpxchg_acquire(count, 1, 0) == 1)) return 1; return 0; } diff --git a/include/asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h b/include/asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h index f169ec064785..a6b4a7bd6ac9 100644 --- a/include/asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h +++ b/include/asm-generic/mutex-xchg.h @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ __mutex_fastpath_lock(atomic_t *count, void (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *)) * to ensure that any waiting tasks are woken up by the * unlock slow path. */ - if (likely(atomic_xchg(count, -1) != 1)) + if (likely(atomic_xchg_acquire(count, -1) != 1)) fail_fn(count); } @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ __mutex_fastpath_lock(atomic_t *count, void (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *)) static inline int __mutex_fastpath_lock_retval(atomic_t *count) { - if (unlikely(atomic_xchg(count, 0) != 1)) + if (unlikely(atomic_xchg_acquire(count, 0) != 1)) if (likely(atomic_xchg(count, -1) != 1)) return -1; return 0; @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ __mutex_fastpath_lock_retval(atomic_t *count) static inline void __mutex_fastpath_unlock(atomic_t *count, void (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *)) { - if (unlikely(atomic_xchg(count, 1) != 0)) + if (unlikely(atomic_xchg_release(count, 1) != 0)) fail_fn(count); } @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ __mutex_fastpath_unlock(atomic_t *count, void (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *)) static inline int __mutex_fastpath_trylock(atomic_t *count, int (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *)) { - int prev = atomic_xchg(count, 0); + int prev = atomic_xchg_acquire(count, 0); if (unlikely(prev < 0)) { /* @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ __mutex_fastpath_trylock(atomic_t *count, int (*fail_fn)(atomic_t *)) * owner's unlock path needlessly, but that's not a problem * in practice. ] */ - prev = atomic_xchg(count, prev); + prev = atomic_xchg_acquire(count, prev); if (prev < 0) prev = 0; } diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c index 4cccea6b8934..0551c219c40e 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c +++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c @@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ static inline int mutex_can_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock) static inline bool mutex_try_to_acquire(struct mutex *lock) { return !mutex_is_locked(lock) && - (atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->count, 1, 0) == 1); + (atomic_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->count, 1, 0) == 1); } /* @@ -529,7 +529,8 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass, * Once more, try to acquire the lock. Only try-lock the mutex if * it is unlocked to reduce unnecessary xchg() operations. */ - if (!mutex_is_locked(lock) && (atomic_xchg(&lock->count, 0) == 1)) + if (!mutex_is_locked(lock) && + (atomic_xchg_acquire(&lock->count, 0) == 1)) goto skip_wait; debug_mutex_lock_common(lock, &waiter); @@ -553,7 +554,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass, * non-negative in order to avoid unnecessary xchg operations: */ if (atomic_read(&lock->count) >= 0 && - (atomic_xchg(&lock->count, -1) == 1)) + (atomic_xchg_acquire(&lock->count, -1) == 1)) break; /* @@ -867,7 +868,7 @@ static inline int __mutex_trylock_slowpath(atomic_t *lock_count) spin_lock_mutex(&lock->wait_lock, flags); - prev = atomic_xchg(&lock->count, -1); + prev = atomic_xchg_acquire(&lock->count, -1); if (likely(prev == 1)) { mutex_set_owner(lock); mutex_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_);