From: Uwe Kleine-König Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 08:23:10 +0000 (+0200) Subject: ARM: make user_addr_max more robust X-Git-Tag: v3.17-rc1~117^2^2^2 X-Git-Url: http://git.cascardo.info/?p=cascardo%2Flinux.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=83de911cf897a4317147dd9cb379378c2c4abf4c ARM: make user_addr_max more robust With CONFIG_MMU=y get_fs() returns current_thread_info()->addr_limit which is initialized as USER_DS (which in turn is defined to TASK_SIZE) for userspace processes. At least theoretically current_thread_info()->addr_limit is changable by set_fs() to a different limit, so checking for KERNEL_DS is more robust. With !CONFIG_MMU get_fs returns KERNEL_DS. To see what the old variant did you'd have to find out that USER_DS == KERNEL_DS which isn't needed any more with the variant this patch introduces. So it's a bit easier to understand, too. Also if the limit was changed this limit should be returned, not TASK_SIZE. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König --- diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h index 75d95799b6e6..fd42da46828d 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ static inline void set_fs(mm_segment_t fs) #define access_ok(type,addr,size) (__range_ok(addr,size) == 0) #define user_addr_max() \ - (segment_eq(get_fs(), USER_DS) ? TASK_SIZE : ~0UL) + (segment_eq(get_fs(), KERNEL_DS) ? ~0UL : get_fs()) /* * The "__xxx" versions of the user access functions do not verify the