From: Marc Zyngier Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 16:05:25 +0000 (+0000) Subject: ARM: imx: irq: fix buggy usage of irq_data irq field X-Git-Tag: v3.19-rc1~172^2~1 X-Git-Url: http://git.cascardo.info/?p=cascardo%2Flinux.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=e2fd06f6be690a1a9697c0c6338843a35cbd70a3 ARM: imx: irq: fix buggy usage of irq_data irq field mach-imx directly references to the irq field in struct irq_data, and uses this to directly poke hardware register. But irq is the *virtual* irq number, something that has nothing to do with the actual HW irq (stored in the hwirq field). And once we put the stacked domain code in action, the whole thing explodes, as these two values are *very* different. Just replacing all instances of irq with hwirq fixes the issue. Tested-by: Fabio Estevam Acked-by: Shawn Guo Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson --- diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c index 82ea74e68482..1455829c735e 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c @@ -56,14 +56,14 @@ void imx_gpc_post_resume(void) static int imx_gpc_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int on) { - unsigned int idx = d->irq / 32 - 1; + unsigned int idx = d->hwirq / 32 - 1; u32 mask; /* Sanity check for SPI irq */ - if (d->irq < 32) + if (d->hwirq < 32) return -EINVAL; - mask = 1 << d->irq % 32; + mask = 1 << d->hwirq % 32; gpc_wake_irqs[idx] = on ? gpc_wake_irqs[idx] | mask : gpc_wake_irqs[idx] & ~mask; @@ -97,12 +97,12 @@ void imx_gpc_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d) u32 val; /* Sanity check for SPI irq */ - if (d->irq < 32) + if (d->hwirq < 32) return; - reg = gpc_base + GPC_IMR1 + (d->irq / 32 - 1) * 4; + reg = gpc_base + GPC_IMR1 + (d->hwirq / 32 - 1) * 4; val = readl_relaxed(reg); - val &= ~(1 << d->irq % 32); + val &= ~(1 << d->hwirq % 32); writel_relaxed(val, reg); } @@ -112,12 +112,12 @@ void imx_gpc_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d) u32 val; /* Sanity check for SPI irq */ - if (d->irq < 32) + if (d->hwirq < 32) return; - reg = gpc_base + GPC_IMR1 + (d->irq / 32 - 1) * 4; + reg = gpc_base + GPC_IMR1 + (d->hwirq / 32 - 1) * 4; val = readl_relaxed(reg); - val |= 1 << (d->irq % 32); + val |= 1 << (d->hwirq % 32); writel_relaxed(val, reg); }