From 5aab90ce1ec449912a2ebc4d45e0c85dac29e9dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jiri Olsa Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 11:48:24 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] perf/powerpc: Don't call perf_event_disable() from atomic context The trinity syscall fuzzer triggered following WARN() on powerpc: WARNING: CPU: 9 PID: 2998 at arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c:278 ... NIP [c00000000093aedc] .hw_breakpoint_handler+0x28c/0x2b0 LR [c00000000093aed8] .hw_breakpoint_handler+0x288/0x2b0 Call Trace: [c0000002f7933580] [c00000000093aed8] .hw_breakpoint_handler+0x288/0x2b0 (unreliable) [c0000002f7933630] [c0000000000f671c] .notifier_call_chain+0x7c/0xf0 [c0000002f79336d0] [c0000000000f6abc] .__atomic_notifier_call_chain+0xbc/0x1c0 [c0000002f7933780] [c0000000000f6c40] .notify_die+0x70/0xd0 [c0000002f7933820] [c00000000001a74c] .do_break+0x4c/0x100 [c0000002f7933920] [c0000000000089fc] handle_dabr_fault+0x14/0x48 Followed by a lockdep warning: =============================== [ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ] 4.8.0-rc5+ #7 Tainted: G W ------------------------------- ./include/linux/rcupdate.h:556 Illegal context switch in RCU read-side critical section! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0 2 locks held by ls/2998: #0: (rcu_read_lock){......}, at: [] .__atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x0/0x1c0 #1: (rcu_read_lock){......}, at: [] .hw_breakpoint_handler+0x0/0x2b0 stack backtrace: CPU: 9 PID: 2998 Comm: ls Tainted: G W 4.8.0-rc5+ #7 Call Trace: [c0000002f7933150] [c00000000094b1f8] .dump_stack+0xe0/0x14c (unreliable) [c0000002f79331e0] [c00000000013c468] .lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x138/0x180 [c0000002f7933270] [c0000000001005d8] .___might_sleep+0x278/0x2e0 [c0000002f7933300] [c000000000935584] .mutex_lock_nested+0x64/0x5a0 [c0000002f7933410] [c00000000023084c] .perf_event_ctx_lock_nested+0x16c/0x380 [c0000002f7933500] [c000000000230a80] .perf_event_disable+0x20/0x60 [c0000002f7933580] [c00000000093aeec] .hw_breakpoint_handler+0x29c/0x2b0 [c0000002f7933630] [c0000000000f671c] .notifier_call_chain+0x7c/0xf0 [c0000002f79336d0] [c0000000000f6abc] .__atomic_notifier_call_chain+0xbc/0x1c0 [c0000002f7933780] [c0000000000f6c40] .notify_die+0x70/0xd0 [c0000002f7933820] [c00000000001a74c] .do_break+0x4c/0x100 [c0000002f7933920] [c0000000000089fc] handle_dabr_fault+0x14/0x48 While it looks like the first WARN() is probably valid, the other one is triggered by disabling event via perf_event_disable() from atomic context. The event is disabled here in case we were not able to emulate the instruction that hit the breakpoint. By disabling the event we unschedule the event and make sure it's not scheduled back. But we can't call perf_event_disable() from atomic context, instead we need to use the event's pending_disable irq_work method to disable it. Reported-by: Jan Stancek Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Huang Ying Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Michael Neuling Cc: Paul Mackerras Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161026094824.GA21397@krava Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 2 +- include/linux/perf_event.h | 1 + kernel/events/core.c | 10 ++++++++-- 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c index 9781c69eae57..03d089b3ed72 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c @@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ int hw_breakpoint_handler(struct die_args *args) if (!stepped) { WARN(1, "Unable to handle hardware breakpoint. Breakpoint at " "0x%lx will be disabled.", info->address); - perf_event_disable(bp); + perf_event_disable_inatomic(bp); goto out; } /* diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h index 060d0ede88df..4741ecdb9817 100644 --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h @@ -1257,6 +1257,7 @@ extern u64 perf_swevent_set_period(struct perf_event *event); extern void perf_event_enable(struct perf_event *event); extern void perf_event_disable(struct perf_event *event); extern void perf_event_disable_local(struct perf_event *event); +extern void perf_event_disable_inatomic(struct perf_event *event); extern void perf_event_task_tick(void); #else /* !CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS: */ static inline void * diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c index a5d2e62faf7e..0e292132efac 100644 --- a/kernel/events/core.c +++ b/kernel/events/core.c @@ -1960,6 +1960,12 @@ void perf_event_disable(struct perf_event *event) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_event_disable); +void perf_event_disable_inatomic(struct perf_event *event) +{ + event->pending_disable = 1; + irq_work_queue(&event->pending); +} + static void perf_set_shadow_time(struct perf_event *event, struct perf_event_context *ctx, u64 tstamp) @@ -7075,8 +7081,8 @@ static int __perf_event_overflow(struct perf_event *event, if (events && atomic_dec_and_test(&event->event_limit)) { ret = 1; event->pending_kill = POLL_HUP; - event->pending_disable = 1; - irq_work_queue(&event->pending); + + perf_event_disable_inatomic(event); } READ_ONCE(event->overflow_handler)(event, data, regs); -- 2.20.1