From eeaed4bb5a35591470b545590bb2f26dbe7653a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sinan Kaya Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:31:30 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] ACPI/PCI/IRQ: assign ISA IRQ directly during early boot stages We do not want to store the SCI penalty in the acpi_isa_irq_penalty[] table because acpi_isa_irq_penalty[] only holds ISA IRQ penalties and there's no guarantee that the SCI is an ISA IRQ. We add in the SCI penalty as a special case in acpi_irq_get_penalty(). But if we called acpi_penalize_isa_irq() or acpi_irq_penalty_update() for an SCI that happened to be an ISA IRQ, they stored the SCI penalty (part of the acpi_irq_get_penalty() return value) in acpi_isa_irq_penalty[]. Subsequent calls to acpi_irq_get_penalty() returned a penalty that included *two* SCI penalties. Fixes: 103544d86976 (ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements) Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas Tested-by: Jonathan Liu Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/acpi/pci_link.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c index c983bf733ad3..6229b022a5d4 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c @@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ static int __init acpi_irq_penalty_update(char *str, int used) continue; if (used) - new_penalty = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) + + new_penalty = acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] + PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED; else new_penalty = 0; @@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ static int __init acpi_irq_penalty_update(char *str, int used) void acpi_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active) { if ((irq >= 0) && (irq < ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_isa_irq_penalty))) - acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) + + acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] += (active ? PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED : PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING); } -- 2.20.1