x86/tsc: Do not check X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC in notifier call
authorBorislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Tue, 5 Apr 2016 06:29:52 +0000 (08:29 +0200)
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Wed, 13 Apr 2016 09:37:43 +0000 (11:37 +0200)
... because the notifier-registering routine already does that. Also,
rename cpufreq_tsc() init call to something more telling.

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1459837795-2588-4-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
arch/x86/kernel/tsc.c

index a0346bc..5bb702c 100644 (file)
@@ -922,9 +922,6 @@ static int time_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
        struct cpufreq_freqs *freq = data;
        unsigned long *lpj;
 
-       if (cpu_has(&cpu_data(freq->cpu), X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC))
-               return 0;
-
        lpj = &boot_cpu_data.loops_per_jiffy;
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
        if (!(freq->flags & CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS))
@@ -954,7 +951,7 @@ static struct notifier_block time_cpufreq_notifier_block = {
        .notifier_call  = time_cpufreq_notifier
 };
 
-static int __init cpufreq_tsc(void)
+static int __init cpufreq_register_tsc_scaling(void)
 {
        if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSC))
                return 0;
@@ -965,7 +962,7 @@ static int __init cpufreq_tsc(void)
        return 0;
 }
 
-core_initcall(cpufreq_tsc);
+core_initcall(cpufreq_register_tsc_scaling);
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_CPU_FREQ */