In case @cpu == smp_proccessor_id(), we can avoid a sleep+wakeup
cycle by doing a preemption.
Callers such as sched_exec() can benefit from this change.
Signed-off-by: Cheng Chao <cs.os.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Cc: tj@kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1473818510-6779-1-git-send-email-cs.os.kernel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
* holding rq->lock, if p->on_rq == 0 it cannot get enqueued because
* we're holding p->pi_lock.
*/
* holding rq->lock, if p->on_rq == 0 it cannot get enqueued because
* we're holding p->pi_lock.
*/
- if (task_rq(p) == rq && task_on_rq_queued(p))
- rq = __migrate_task(rq, p, arg->dest_cpu);
+ if (task_rq(p) == rq) {
+ if (task_on_rq_queued(p))
+ rq = __migrate_task(rq, p, arg->dest_cpu);
+ else
+ p->wake_cpu = arg->dest_cpu;
+ }
raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
raw_spin_unlock(&p->pi_lock);
raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
raw_spin_unlock(&p->pi_lock);
cpu_stop_init_done(&done, 1);
if (!cpu_stop_queue_work(cpu, &work))
return -ENOENT;
cpu_stop_init_done(&done, 1);
if (!cpu_stop_queue_work(cpu, &work))
return -ENOENT;
+ /*
+ * In case @cpu == smp_proccessor_id() we can avoid a sleep+wakeup
+ * cycle by doing a preemption:
+ */
+ cond_resched();
wait_for_completion(&done.completion);
return done.ret;
}
wait_for_completion(&done.completion);
return done.ret;
}