checkpatch: make the memory barrier test noisier
authorJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Tue, 12 Nov 2013 23:10:11 +0000 (15:10 -0800)
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Wed, 13 Nov 2013 03:09:25 +0000 (12:09 +0900)
Peter Zijlstra prefers that comments be required near uses of memory
barriers.

Change the message level for memory barrier uses from a --strict test only
to a normal WARN so it's always emitted.

This might produce false positives around insertions of memory barriers
when a comment is outside the patch context block.

And checkpatch is still stupid, it only looks for existence of any
comment, not at the comment content.

Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
scripts/checkpatch.pl

index 23d55bf..2e40f64 100755 (executable)
@@ -3850,8 +3850,8 @@ sub process {
 # check for memory barriers without a comment.
                if ($line =~ /\b(mb|rmb|wmb|read_barrier_depends|smp_mb|smp_rmb|smp_wmb|smp_read_barrier_depends)\(/) {
                        if (!ctx_has_comment($first_line, $linenr)) {
-                               CHK("MEMORY_BARRIER",
-                                   "memory barrier without comment\n" . $herecurr);
+                               WARN("MEMORY_BARRIER",
+                                    "memory barrier without comment\n" . $herecurr);
                        }
                }
 # check of hardware specific defines