+.. _submitchecklist:
+
Linux Kernel patch submission checklist
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel patch submissions accepted more quickly.
These are all above and beyond the documentation that is provided in
-Documentation/SubmittingPatches
+:ref:`Documentation/SubmittingPatches <submittingpatches>`
and elsewhere regarding submitting Linux kernel patches.
4) ppc64 is a good architecture for cross-compilation checking because it
tends to use ``unsigned long`` for 64-bit quantities.
-5: Check your patch for general style as detailed in
- Documentation/CodingStyle.
+5) Check your patch for general style as detailed in
+ :ref:`Documentation/CodingStyle <codingstyle>`.
Check for trivial violations with the patch style checker prior to
submission (``scripts/checkpatch.pl``).
You should be able to justify all violations that remain in
but any one function that uses more than 512 bytes on the stack is a
candidate for change.
-11: Include :ref:`kernel-doc <kernel_doc>` to document global kernel APIs.
+11) Include :ref:`kernel-doc <kernel_doc>` to document global kernel APIs.
(Not required for static functions, but OK there also.) Use
``make htmldocs`` or ``make pdfdocs`` to check the
:ref:`kernel-doc <kernel_doc>` and fix any issues.
maintainer does not respond or you cannot find the appropriate
maintainer then please contact Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>.
-Linux 2.6:
+Linux 2.6 and upper:
The same rules apply as 2.4 except that you should follow linux-kernel
- to track changes in API's. The final contact point for Linux 2.6
+ to track changes in API's. The final contact point for Linux 2.6+
submissions is Andrew Morton.
What Criteria Determine Acceptance
Code:
Please use the Linux style of code formatting as documented
- in Documentation/CodingStyle. If you have sections of code
+ in :ref:`Documentation/CodingStyle <codingStyle>`.
+ If you have sections of code
that need to be in other formats, for example because they
are shared with a windows driver kit and you want to
maintain them just once separate them out nicely and note
This document contains a large number of suggestions in a relatively terse
format. For detailed information on how the kernel development process
-works, see Documentation/development-process. Also, read
-Documentation/SubmitChecklist for a list of items to check before
+works, see :ref:`Documentation/development-process <development_process_main>`.
+Also, read :ref:`Documentation/SubmitChecklist <submitchecklist>`
+for a list of items to check before
submitting code. If you are submitting a driver, also read
-Documentation/SubmittingDrivers; for device tree binding patches, read
+:ref:`Documentation/SubmittingDrivers <submittingdrivers>`;
+for device tree binding patches, read
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt.
Many of these steps describe the default behavior of the ``git`` version
---------------------------
Check your patch for basic style violations, details of which can be
-found in Documentation/CodingStyle. Failure to do so simply wastes
+found in
+:ref:`Documentation/CodingStyle <codingstyle>`.
+Failure to do so simply wastes
the reviewers time and will get your patch rejected, probably
without even being read.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
into the sign-off area of your patch (note, NOT an email recipient). You
-should also read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt in addition to this
-file.
+should also read
+:ref:`Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt <stable_kernel_rules>`
+in addition to this file.
Note, however, that some subsystem maintainers want to come to their own
conclusions on which patches should go to the stable trees. The networking
Exception: If your mailer is mangling patches then someone may ask
you to re-send them using MIME.
-See Documentation/email-clients.txt for hints about configuring
-your e-mail client so that it sends your patches untouched.
+See :ref:`Documentation/email-clients.txt <email_clients>`
+for hints about configuring your e-mail client so that it sends your patches
+untouched.
7) E-mail size
--------------
<https://lkml.org/lkml/2005/7/11/336>
Kernel Documentation/CodingStyle:
- <Documentation/CodingStyle>
+ :ref:`Documentation/CodingStyle <codingstyle>`
Linus Torvalds's mail on the canonical patch format:
<http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/4/7/183>
+.. _development_process_main:
+
A guide to the Kernel Development Process
=========================================
race can be exploited is also provided.
- It cannot contain any "trivial" fixes in it (spelling changes,
whitespace cleanups, etc).
- - It must follow the Documentation/SubmittingPatches rules.
+ - It must follow the
+ :ref:`Documentation/SubmittingPatches <submittingpatches>`
+ rules.
- It or an equivalent fix must already exist in Linus' tree (upstream).
submission guidelines as described in
Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt
- Security patches should not be handled (solely) by the -stable review
- process but should follow the procedures in Documentation/SecurityBugs.
+ process but should follow the procedures in
+ :ref:`Documentation/SecurityBugs <securitybugs>`.
For all other submissions, choose one of the following procedures
-----------------------------------------------------------------
projects / cascardo / linux.git / commitdiff