radix-tree: add test for radix_tree_locate_item()
authorRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Sat, 21 May 2016 00:02:49 +0000 (17:02 -0700)
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Sat, 21 May 2016 00:58:30 +0000 (17:58 -0700)
Add a unit test that provides coverage for the bug fixed in the commit
entitled "radix-tree: rewrite radix_tree_locate_item fix" from Hugh
Dickins.  I've verified that this test fails before his patch due to
miscalculated 'index' values in __locate() in lib/radix-tree.c, and
passes with his fix.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1462307263-20623-1-git-send-email-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
tools/testing/radix-tree/linux/init.h [new file with mode: 0644]
tools/testing/radix-tree/main.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/radix-tree/linux/init.h b/tools/testing/radix-tree/linux/init.h
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..360cabb
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+/* An empty file stub that allows radix-tree.c to compile. */
index 65231e9..b7619ff 100644 (file)
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ void copy_tag_check(void)
        item_kill_tree(&tree);
 }
 
-void __locate_check(struct radix_tree_root *tree, unsigned long index,
+static void __locate_check(struct radix_tree_root *tree, unsigned long index,
                        unsigned order)
 {
        struct item *item;
@@ -248,12 +248,25 @@ void __locate_check(struct radix_tree_root *tree, unsigned long index,
        }
 }
 
+static void __order_0_locate_check(void)
+{
+       RADIX_TREE(tree, GFP_KERNEL);
+       int i;
+
+       for (i = 0; i < 50; i++)
+               __locate_check(&tree, rand() % INT_MAX, 0);
+
+       item_kill_tree(&tree);
+}
+
 static void locate_check(void)
 {
        RADIX_TREE(tree, GFP_KERNEL);
        unsigned order;
        unsigned long offset, index;
 
+       __order_0_locate_check();
+
        for (order = 0; order < 20; order++) {
                for (offset = 0; offset < (1 << (order + 3));
                     offset += (1UL << order)) {