drm/i915: Fix refcount leak and possible NULL pointerdereference.
authorTetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Fri, 3 Jan 2014 11:42:18 +0000 (20:42 +0900)
committerDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Mon, 6 Jan 2014 09:56:36 +0000 (10:56 +0100)
Since get_pid_task() grabs a reference on the task_struct, we have to drop the
refcount after reading that task's comm name. Use pid_task() with RCU instead.

Also, avoid directly reading like pid_task()->comm because
pid_task() will return NULL if the task have already exit()ed.

This patch fixes both problems.

Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c

index 6294ffd..6fe7934 100644 (file)
@@ -404,16 +404,26 @@ static int i915_gem_object_info(struct seq_file *m, void* data)
        seq_putc(m, '\n');
        list_for_each_entry_reverse(file, &dev->filelist, lhead) {
                struct file_stats stats;
+               struct task_struct *task;
 
                memset(&stats, 0, sizeof(stats));
                idr_for_each(&file->object_idr, per_file_stats, &stats);
+               /*
+                * Although we have a valid reference on file->pid, that does
+                * not guarantee that the task_struct who called get_pid() is
+                * still alive (e.g. get_pid(current) => fork() => exit()).
+                * Therefore, we need to protect this ->comm access using RCU.
+                */
+               rcu_read_lock();
+               task = pid_task(file->pid, PIDTYPE_PID);
                seq_printf(m, "%s: %u objects, %zu bytes (%zu active, %zu inactive, %zu unbound)\n",
-                          get_pid_task(file->pid, PIDTYPE_PID)->comm,
+                          task ? task->comm : "<unknown>",
                           stats.count,
                           stats.total,
                           stats.active,
                           stats.inactive,
                           stats.unbound);
+               rcu_read_unlock();
        }
 
        mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);